John Golborne: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1724-1783, canal engineer of Cheshire | John Golborne (1724-1783), canal engineer of Cheshire | ||
1724 Born in Chester, son of William Golborne, a schoolmaster | 1724 Born in Chester, son of William Golborne, a schoolmaster | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==Sources of Information== | ==Sources of Information== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
* | * [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jeOMfpYMOtYC&pg=PA256&lpg=PA256&dq=john+golborne+river+clyde&source=bl&ots=aCexT_3d4c&sig=kRRN4X7cqUVYs20UA8pPzqU5QKo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jrPuUb35OcjvOcfSgPAD&ved=0CDsQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=john%20golborne%20river%20clyde&f=false Biographies of James Golborne, and John Golborne ] | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT: Golborne, J }} | {{DEFAULTSORT: Golborne, J }} | ||
[[Category: Biography ]] | [[Category: Biography ]] | ||
[[Category: Births 1720-1729]] | |||
[[Category: Deaths 1780-1789]] | |||
Revision as of 07:39, 14 July 2016
John Golborne (1724-1783), canal engineer of Cheshire
1724 Born in Chester, son of William Golborne, a schoolmaster
1735 Attended Kings School, Chester
Worked for his elder brother, James, on the River Dee
c.1754 Became Engineer to the River Dee company, which post he held until the end of his life.
1759 Worked on improvement of the Newry Canal but the scheme failed
1760 Worked on repairing a lock on the River Weaver
1768 Advised on an alternative to Smeaton's scheme for the Forth and Clyde Canal. Invited to advise on improving the navigability of the Clyde for the Clyde River Improvement Trust
1769 Recommended that James Watt be asked to check Smeaton's depth soundings of the river, which he was and confirmed Smeaton's measurements.
1769 With Brindley and Yeoman, advised on improvements to the outfall of the River Nene.
1770-5 Implemented his scheme for improving the Clyde; his nephew James Golborne (1746-1819) was resident engineer.
1777 Reported on the proposal to extend Kinderley's Cut near Wisbech; this report was reprinted because of the ongoing debate.