Ward and Peek: Difference between revisions
From Graces Guide
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Is this Thomas Peek the son of [[Thomas Peek]]? | Is this Thomas Peek the son of [[Thomas Peek]]? | ||
1848 Partnership dissolved. '...the Partnership heretofore subsisting between us the undersigned, William Ward and Thomas Peek, carrying on business at No. 17, Nicholls-square, in the city of London, as Machine Rulers, under the style or firm of [[Ward and Peek]], has been this day dissolved by mutual consent...'<ref>[The London Gazette | 1848 Partnership dissolved. '...the Partnership heretofore subsisting between us the undersigned, William Ward and Thomas Peek, carrying on business at No. 17, Nicholls-square, in the city of London, as Machine Rulers, under the style or firm of [[Ward and Peek]], has been this day dissolved by mutual consent...'<ref>[https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/20924/page/4487|The London Gazette date:8 December 1848 Issue:20924 Page:4487]</ref> | ||
'''Notes | '''Notes | ||
Latest revision as of 17:12, 12 November 2024
of London
Is this Thomas Peek the son of Thomas Peek?
1848 Partnership dissolved. '...the Partnership heretofore subsisting between us the undersigned, William Ward and Thomas Peek, carrying on business at No. 17, Nicholls-square, in the city of London, as Machine Rulers, under the style or firm of Ward and Peek, has been this day dissolved by mutual consent...'[1]
Notes
- 1859 Insolvent Debtor. 'Thomas John Peek, sued as Thomas Peek, and known as Thomas Peek, junr., formerly of No. 22, Vaughan-terrace, City-road, afterwards of No. 21, Upton-road North, De Beauvoir Town, Kingsland, and at the same time occupying a room at No. 17, Nicholls-square, Aldersgate street, city, Paper Cutter, employed during the whole time by Thomas Peek, Senr., of No. 17, Nicholls-square aforesaid, all in Middlesex, Machine Ruler, for part of the time letting unfurnished apartments.'[2]
See Also
Loading...